Find and reconcile
Import findings from agreed scanners, remove duplicates and connect them to an asset and service owner.
From findings to verified actionFinding the risk
Finding the risk
is the beginning.
Bring scanner findings into the context of the business. We design a remediation process that combines exposure, asset criticality and available fixes, with explicit decisions for exceptions and compensating controls.
A long vulnerability list does not say who will fix each issue, what can safely change, or whether the fix worked. The bottleneck often sits between discovery and approved action.
Discuss this service →What we can design and deliverA defined scope.
A defined scope.
A useful outcome.
Prioritise in context
Consider active exploitation information, exposure, asset importance and the client’s remediation policy alongside severity.
Assign and prepare
Create the work item with clear fix guidance, dependencies, maintenance windows and acceptance evidence.
Patch or mitigate
Plan staged patching, configuration or code fixes; assess temporary WAF or isolation controls when a permanent fix must wait.
Verify the outcome
Rescan or run agreed checks, capture evidence and reopen work when the expected result is not achieved.
Report and manage exceptions
Track remediation age, service-level targets and overdue exceptions; prepare risk-acceptance drafts for the risk owner.
A controlled workflow
Clear steps. Visible decisions.
- 01Find
- 02Prioritise
- 03Assign
- 04Approve and remediate
- 05Verify
- 06Report
Critical production changes, disruptive mitigations and residual-risk acceptance require authorised approval. Automated rollback is used only where a tested mechanism exists; it is not assumed for every platform.
Your delivery pack
What you take away.
- Finding-to-owner mapping
- Risk and remediation rules
- Ticket and change integrations
- Staged remediation and recovery runbooks
- Verification dashboard and exception register
Evidence from the pilot
What we measure.
- Time to remediate critical findings
- Findings fixed within the agreed service level
- Exposed critical assets still awaiting action
- Engineer effort and verification failures
Baseline, workload, scope and success criteria are agreed before the pilot. Results and savings are measured, not guaranteed.
Works with your environment.
Qualys, Tenable, Rapid7 and Microsoft Defender findings can feed a client-approved workflow. Imperva, Cloudflare or F5 controls, privileged access and ITSM integrations are selected to match the environment.
View the technology capability map →Connected services
Build the right combination.
AI and automation
Join security, IT operations and business workflows with scoped access, tested actions and evidence of what changed.
Explore the serviceAI IT support engineer
Connect trusted IT knowledge, service tools and approved fixes to help your support team resolve repeat issues.
Explore the serviceAI-assisted testing and QA
Use AI to help design and maintain tests, then run them in repeatable tools with results that engineers can inspect.
Explore the serviceHow every product startsOne project or one application, measured in writing
1. ShadowThe AI works beside your team
2. Run approved tasksYour process owner checks the results
3. MeasureHours and cost saved, in writing
Let’s work together
Discuss your project Start with one useful outcome.
Let’s agree the scope, evidence and controls for a focused pilot.